What this report settles
An analysis of more than 11,400 jewellery campaigns found micro creators between 10,000 and 100,000 followers returning 5.96% engagement against 1.21% for accounts above a million, at a cost per engagement of about seven pence. In a category converting at 1 to 1.7%, the creator's job is trust and scale rather than reach.
Everything on this page is drawn from the report itself. The examples are real and the figures are the ones inside it.
The questions below are answered in full. The rest of the report opens as soon as you tell us who you are.
Engagement figures come from an analysis of more than 11,400 jewellery brand campaigns. Cost per engagement is reported in the currency of the source. Every number on this page is an observed benchmark from the ad set described above. None of it is a projection, and none of it is a performance QuickAds is promising your account.
Six questions this report settles with a number
Each answer is quoted from the study and names the ad set it was observed in.
Do micro influencers outperform large accounts in jewellery?
Question 01 of sixBy about five to one. Across more than 11,400 jewellery campaigns, micro creators between 10,000 and 100,000 followers delivered 5.96% average engagement against 1.21% for accounts above a million. Nano creators in hyper-niche communities reach 6 to 10%. From the QuickAds jewelry creator marketing report.
What is the most budget-efficient jewellery creator model?
Question 02 of sixGift eight to twelve micro creators, identify the two or three pieces with the strongest organic engagement, then put paid spend behind those specific posts. It lets the audience pick the winner rather than the brief. From the QuickAds jewelry creator marketing report.
Why does jewellery convert so poorly online?
Question 03 of sixTypical e-commerce conversion runs 1 to 1.7%, the lowest of any category, because nobody can hold a four-figure product before buying. That is a trust problem, and reach does not solve it. From the QuickAds jewelry creator marketing report.
What should jewellery creator content actually show?
Question 04 of sixTrue scale on a real hand, and a reason to believe the brand. Judge content on whether it answers how big is it actually and would I trust this brand. Reach is the wrong first question in this category. From the QuickAds jewelry creator marketing report.
How much should a jewellery brand spend on creators?
Question 05 of sixModel it against average order value rather than a CPM. At an average engagement ring price near $4,600, a single conversion covers a dozen micro creators, which makes the cheap tier better maths rather than a compromise. From the QuickAds jewelry creator marketing report.
When should jewellery brands book creators?
Question 06 of sixIn September, for January and February. Demand runs Thanksgiving to Valentine's with roughly 47% of US engagements in that window, but creator rates peak in December alongside it. The December premium is avoidable; the January demand is not. From the QuickAds jewelry creator marketing report.
One exhibit, partly open
Four of the measured figures. The full report carries the gifting model, the rates and the season.
What the campaign data shows
Live rows| Measure | Figure |
|---|---|
| Micro engagement on jewellery | 5.96% |
| Mega engagement, same content | 1.21% |
| Nano engagement, hyper-niche | 6-10% |
| Micro cost per engagement | ~£0.07 |
One sale at $4,600 changes what affordable means.
Five moves, in order
Drawn from the report. The reasoning behind each one sits in the full study.
- Reweight budget below 100,000 followers before renegotiating anything.
- Negotiate paid usage rights into the gifting offer up front, or amplification is impossible.
- Judge content on scale and believability, not reach.
- Model creator spend against average order value rather than CPM.
- Book January and February creators in September.
Built for the people briefing the work
- Fine, demi-fine and fashion jewelry brands buying creator content
- Growth leads with budget weighted above 100,000 followers
- Brands whose creator content never answers how big is it
- Anyone booking creators inside the December premium
Read ad by ad, not modelled
- Engagement data from an analysis of more than 11,400 jewellery brand campaigns.
- Cost per engagement reported in the source currency rather than converted.
- Season data carried across from the Q4 jewelry research and attributed.
- Not a directory. The report is about tier weighting and timing, not who to hire.
Open the full study
Submit the form to download the printable PDF text and data edition, then open the complete online report.
Report unlocked
Your request is saved. The PDF download will start, then the online report will open. If your browser pauses the download, use Download PDF again.
Read it now