Skip to the summary
Beauty and supplement creator rates

Beauty rates are half the card.

Beauty and supplement creator rates from 294 confirmed deals, rather than published rate cards that contradict themselves.

Get the full report See what is inside

US and India · Q4 2026 · free to read · one short form

$25-2,000
quoted for one tier
294
confirmed deals
$1,000
confirmed micro median
75%
of creators are nano or micro
Explore QuickAdsAd researchServicesReportsGuidesPricingSign in
The short version

What this report settles

QAFrom the QuickAds ad research library

Published rate cards for beauty and supplement creators disagree by two orders of magnitude, and one publisher contradicts itself across its own pages. The single dataset built on confirmed deals rather than asking prices puts the micro median at $1,000 with a 25th percentile of $480, which means most brands anchor on a ceiling and negotiate down from it.

Everything on this page is drawn from the report itself. The examples are real and the figures are the ones inside it.

The questions below are answered in full. The rest of the report opens as soon as you tell us who you are.

$1,000Confirmed micro median per post, from 294 closed deals
$480Confirmed micro 25th percentile
$2,706Confirmed micro mean, skewed by outliers
5-9%Nano engagement on Instagram, against 0.5-1.5% at mega
$0.10-0.50Cost per engagement at nano, against $2 to $5 at macro
30.9%Of brand and creator relationships repeat

Confirmed-deal figures come from the one dataset built on closed deals rather than asking prices, 294 in total. Published rate-card ranges are reproduced as published, including where they conflict. Every number on this page is an observed benchmark from the ad set described above. None of it is a projection, and none of it is a performance QuickAds is promising your account.

Answered here

Six questions this report settles with a number

Each answer is quoted from the study and names the ad set it was observed in.

  • How much do beauty creators actually charge?

    Question 01 of six

    The one dataset built on confirmed deals rather than asking prices puts the micro median at $1,000 per post, with a 25th percentile of $480 and a mean of $2,706 skewed by outliers. Published ranges are accurate at their top and miss where deals close. From the QuickAds beauty and supplement creator rates report.

  • Why do published influencer rate cards disagree so much?

    Question 02 of six

    Because none of them measure the same thing. A nano creator on Instagram is quoted at $25 to $150 by one publisher, $50 to $200 by another, $100 to $500 by a third and $200 to $2,000 by a fourth, and the third and fourth are the same company on two pages. From the QuickAds beauty and supplement creator rates report.

  • What does affordable actually mean for creator content?

    Question 03 of six

    A unit price, not a follower tier. A 112,000-follower account averaging 9,600 views at $980 costs $102 per thousand views; a 46,800-follower account averaging 15,100 views at $740 costs $49. Ask for average views on the last ten posts before discussing price. From the QuickAds beauty and supplement creator rates report.

  • Are there enough small creators to run an affordable programme?

    Question 04 of six

    Yes. Of nearly 78,000 tracked TikTok creators, 37.9% are nano and 37% micro. Supply was never the constraint. Finding and vetting them takes longer than the budget saved, which is why brands default to the expensive tier they can find quickly. From the QuickAds beauty and supplement creator rates report.

  • Why do supplement creators cost more than beauty creators?

    Question 05 of six

    Nano supplement rates run $100 to $700 against beauty's $50 to $200, and the premium is regulatory rather than about audience value. Meta moved to claims-based enforcement in July 2026 and the FTC holds the advertiser liable for what an endorser says. From the QuickAds beauty and supplement creator rates report.

  • Where should you open a creator negotiation?

    Question 06 of six

    At the 25th percentile, not the midpoint of a published range. Brands anchor on a ceiling and negotiate down from it, when a meaningful share of deals close near $480 at micro. From the QuickAds beauty and supplement creator rates report.

Sneak peek

One exhibit, partly open

Six of the confirmed figures. The full report carries the rate cards, the supply map and the claims premium.

What the tiers actually cost

Live rows
MeasureFigure
Confirmed micro median, per post$1,000
Confirmed micro 25th percentile$480
Beauty nano, per Instagram Reel$50-200
Supplements nano, per Instagram Reel$100-700
LockedThe full rate cards, where the supply is, the claims premium and how to price it

Cheap and underpriced are different things, and only one of them works twice.

What to do about it

Five moves, in order

Drawn from the report. The reasoning behind each one sits in the full study.

  1. Stop using published ranges as a budget input. Use them only to check your order of magnitude.
  2. Open at the 25th percentile rather than the midpoint.
  3. Ask for average views on the last ten posts, then divide the quote by that number.
  4. Count sourcing time as part of the rate. A $200 creator who takes three hours is not $200.
  5. Put the banned-phrase list in the brief, not the contract.
Who this is for

Built for the people briefing the work

  • Beauty or supplement brands briefing creators on a volume budget
  • Growth leads who got ten different quotes from one tier
  • Anyone told micro is $500 to $3,500 who paid near the top
  • Supplement brands where one wrong sentence costs more than the creator
How it was built

Read ad by ad, not modelled

  • Confirmed-deal data from 294 closed deals, not asking prices or rate cards.
  • Published ranges reproduced as published, including where publishers contradict themselves.
  • Supply figures from a tracked pool of nearly 78,000 TikTok creators.
  • Not a directory. The report is about how to price and evaluate, not who to hire.
Get the report

Open the full study

Submit the form to download the printable PDF text and data edition, then open the complete online report.

Your details are used to fulfil this report request. Read our Privacy Policy.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Report unlocked

Your request is saved. The PDF download will start, then the online report will open. If your browser pauses the download, use Download PDF again.

Read it now